Starting a survivorship program
To start a cancer survivorship program from nothing, work through eight steps in order: name the population, name the owner, write down what the program covers, attach enrollment to a visit that already happens, decide what happens between visits, decide what reaches the chart, set the two numbers you will review on, and review at six months.
The order matters more than the content of any single step. Most programs that stall did the interesting parts first and left enrollment to the end. If you want the conceptual version of this question rather than the sequence, our guide to what a survivorship program is and how to staff one covers that ground instead.
The eight steps, in order
-
1
Name the population you are starting with
Not "our survivors". One disease site, one treatment intent, one clear boundary, usually breast cancer patients finishing curative-intent treatment. Write down roughly how many people that is per month. Every later decision, including whether you need a platform at all, follows from that number, and programs that skip this step end up designing for a population they never actually define.
-
2
Name the person who owns it
One named owner, with a real allocation of time rather than a line in a job description. A survivorship program with no owner becomes an annual seminar within eighteen months. This is also the step where you find out whether the program is genuinely supported: if nobody can be given the hours, that is useful information now rather than in year two.
-
3
Decide what the program covers, in writing
List the domains explicitly. Fatigue, sleep, cognition, hormone therapy effects, nutrition, activity, emotional wellbeing, and fear of recurrence all behave differently and all persist for years. A written scope is what stops the program quietly becoming a survivorship care plan handout, and it is what you will hand to a vendor if you decide to buy rather than build.
-
4
Write the enrollment trigger into an existing workflow
The trigger must attach to something that already happens, such as the end-of-treatment visit. If enrollment depends on someone remembering, enrollment will not happen. Name the person who does it, the moment they do it, and what they hand over. This is the single most common point of failure in a new program.
-
5
Decide what happens between visits
This is the actual program. A survivor with no appointment for four months either has structured support in that window or does not have a survivorship program. Decide what a participant does in a quiet month, who initiates it, and at what cadence. Anything that requires a clinician to check a dashboard daily will not survive a busy clinic, so design for the patient carrying it.
-
6
Decide what reaches the chart, and what does not
Agree in advance what the care team receives and when. The useful default is a short summary the patient brings to a visit they were already attending, which sharpens an existing appointment rather than creating a new obligation. Agree the same for what does not reach the chart, and make sure the participant understands it too.
-
7
Set the two numbers you will review on
Reach and sustained participation. What proportion of the eligible population enrolled, and what proportion are still checking in at three and six months. Agree both before you launch. A program measured on satisfaction at week one will look excellent and teach you nothing, and a program with no agreed measure will be argued about instead of improved.
-
8
Review at six months and change one thing
Six months is long enough for the drop-off to be real and short enough to still fix. Change one thing at a time, usually the enrollment trigger, because that is where most of the loss is. Where a program is working toward CoC Standard 4.8, this is also the point the documentation of recurring services starts to be worth something.
Where programs usually break
Step four, almost every time. A program with a clear scope, a committed owner, and good content still fails if enrollment depends on somebody remembering at the end of a long clinic. Attaching it to an existing visit, with a named person and a defined handover, is the difference between a program that reaches most of its population and one that reaches the enthusiasts.
The second most common failure is step five. A program that consists of a treatment summary handed over once and an annual seminar has nothing in the four-month gap where survivors actually struggle, and no amount of good intent at the handover point changes that. Deciding what happens in a quiet month is the work.
If you are weighing whether to build this yourself or bring in something ready made, we set out the criteria in survivorship programs: build versus buy, and the evaluation criteria to hold any vendor to, including us, are in how to evaluate a cancer survivorship program. For programs running this across more than one site, survivorship at health system scale covers the version of the problem a larger organization has. If you are doing this with a small team and no dedicated survivorship staff, the constraints are different again, and survivorship programs in community oncology is written for that setting.
Take the sequence with you
The readiness checklist turns the steps above and the CoC Standard 4.8 requirements into a worksheet your coordinator can work through with the team. It is free, and we will email it to you.
Get the survivorship program readiness checklist
A worksheet for the population, the owner, the enrollment trigger, and the documentation.
Your guide is on its way. Check your inbox.
You can grab it here too, right now.
See how Oncera supports survivorship in your program. Book a demo.
Common questions
How to start a cancer survivorship program
Start by naming one population, one owner, and one enrollment trigger attached to a visit that already happens. Everything else, including whether you need software, follows from those three. The most common failure is not a bad plan but an enrollment step that depends on somebody remembering, which is why it belongs in an existing workflow rather than in a policy document.
What is the minimum a survivorship program has to include?
A defined population, a named owner, a written scope of what the program covers after treatment ends, a reliable enrollment trigger, something structured that happens between visits, and a measure you agreed before launch. That is the floor. A treatment summary and follow-up schedule handed over once is a document, not a program, and it will not hold up as one.
Do we need a platform to start a survivorship program?
No, and it is worth being honest about when you do not. A single site with a low monthly volume and a navigator who has real allocated time can run a good program on a spreadsheet and a calendar. A platform changes the arithmetic when volume outgrows the person, when you are running across several sites, or when you need a durable record of recurring services rather than a memory of them. Our comparison of building versus buying sets out the criteria either way.
Where does CoC Standard 4.8 fit into this?
It shapes what has to be documented, not how the program is built. Standard 4.8 asks accredited programs to provide survivorship services for patients treated with curative intent, overseen by the cancer committee and led by a coordinator, with recurring rather than one-off services. Build the program on the sequence above and the documentation follows from it. Your cancer committee and the current Commission on Cancer requirements are the authority on the requirement itself, and no software confers accreditation.
How long does it take to get the first patient enrolled?
Weeks rather than quarters, if the population and the enrollment trigger are decided. The delay in most programs is not build time, it is the four steps above enrollment that nobody has been given time to finish. That is why they are ordered the way they are.
This page is general operational guidance for clinics and cancer programs. It is not medical, legal, or accreditation advice. Clinical decisions and survivorship care plans remain the responsibility of the treating care team, and accreditation requirements should be confirmed against the current Commission on Cancer standards.
Bring your real constraints
Tell us your population, your volumes, and who owns it, and we will tell you honestly whether a platform helps or whether you are better off starting on a spreadsheet. We reply within one business day.
Prefer email? [email protected]